Nikkor 105mm 2.8 VR vs Sigma 180mm 2.8

Started Oct 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
(unknown member) OP Veteran Member • Posts: 4,734
Re: Pretty cool stuff Ed.

Thanks.  I only posted the stuff that I'm not going to use in other modes.

Funny, I don't think much about the extra 30mm until I'm in processing mode.  It's good for live insect and reptile work.  If I was shooting a 12mp body, it'd be way more noticeably good than with a 36mp body.  For static subjects, not at all noticeable.  The only thing I noted today was how much farther away I was, and how much more I had to stop down to get any DOF.

I'm struck by the sharpness of the Sigma lens. I think it's sharper and more contrasty at the 1:1 or less extremes than the Nikkor lenses.

 Ednaz's gear list:Ednaz's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D800E Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Fujifilm X-T1 Nikon D810 +41 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow