D600 RAW noise beats 5D MKIII

Started Oct 5, 2012 | Questions thread
rhlpetrus Forum Pro • Posts: 25,845
Re: Nikon's NR is bad IMO

photomy wrote:

rhlpetrus wrote:

rbirkby wrote:

The D600 beats the competition according the the graphs on:


So why do the sample images look worse?

They don't look worse, especially in RAW. Canon jpegs use a lot of USM and IMO a better NR routine. If you do it yourself, with good conversion and NR, you will be able to get better results from any of these cameras, especially the Nikons (the default NR software is really bad, same as in CNX2).

FYI, the newest CNX2 released this summer has a new NR option that is actually very good up to iso 800/1600 range.  It is called Better Quality 2012 and is in the Camera Development Section.  You need to use much higher settings to get what you need from it.

= tommy

Thanks, have to try  it (even though I usually don't use any NR, I like my grain sharp ).

-- hide signature --

Renato. http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhlpedrosa/ OnExposure member http://www.onexposure.net/ Good shooting and good luck (after Ed Murrow)

 rhlpetrus's gear list:rhlpetrus's gear list
Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) Nikon D7000 Nikon 1 V1 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF Nikon AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow