Olympus 9-18mm IQ: Better than a kit lens?
I realise that the Olympus 9-18mm has been discussed a great deal, and that a number of reviews exist (which I have mostly read). I have a qualitative question though.
How does the IQ (sharpness, contras) compare to a) the 14-42mm II kit lens and b) the good primes (e.g. 20mm/45mm)
Whilst I find the primes solid performers, the kit lens seems less consistent to me and sometimes gives a 'mushy' quality to the images. It's almost as if the images were shot at a higher ISO (I have had to check this before). I suppose I worry that the 9-18mm will also be like this partly because it has a collapsing construction.
FWIW the impression I get so far is that it will perform in general better than the kit lens and worse than the primes, but with a less uniform sharpness profile (e.g. softer-corners). Is this a sensible/accurate expectation?
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Flower in flower by atdigit|
from Random Items Challenge 26
|Surface tension by atdigit|
from Right in the middle
|A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff|
from Show us SCHOOL!