Sony 55-300 Comparison

Started Sep 29, 2012 | Discussions thread
OP jcurtistx Regular Member • Posts: 462
Re: The Tamron is here - how they stack up...

stefan662 wrote:

I made no tests with a stopwatch. But my impression is the Sony is slower to move through the whole focus range especially at the wide end. But the Tamron hunts more than the Sony. So in real world use I think the Sony is faster. But there are no worlds between.

Where the Tamron beats the Sony is the focus noise. The Tamron is more in the league with the SSM of the Sony 16-50/2.8 noise wise.

I agree with that.  The Sony may take longer to go through the entire range back and forth, but it does not seem to hesitate or hunt much to try and lock focus.  The motor is not as whisper quiet as the Tamron 18-270, Tamron 70-300 USD, Sony 18-135 SAM, or Sony 16-50 SSM.  However, when in video mode the focus is very quiet - quiet enough that I cannot really notice it.


-- hide signature --

Sony A57, Sony 18-135, Tamron 60 f2, Sigma 50-150 f2.8, Tamron 70-210 f3.5-4.5 (Circa 1988), Minolta 100-300 APO D

 jcurtistx's gear list:jcurtistx's gear list
Panasonic ZS100 Sony a6000 Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN Art Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS Sigma 30mm F2.8 EX DN +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow