a. canon is not who is bothering me to the point of posting again. its that people dont grasp my point in the first place and are making it out to be different than what im saying.
b. junk - it seems you have misinterpreted me. junk = stuff. i use junk instead of stuff sometimes, but im sorry for confusing you by using junk as opposed to stuff.
c. repetitive - yes, people still arent grasping my point and here i am repeating myself again [a lot of it is my fault, ill get to that later].
contradictory - ok, after tons [not tons as in weight, but tons as in 'lots of'] hard searching
i found something that i wrote incorrectly. in a previous thread i wrote:
'im not worried about losing money on an 'investment' because i bought a camera three months ago which now has a successor. so i wasnt speaking for myself.'
what i meant [i promise] was:
'im not worried about losing money on an 'investment' because i didnt buy a brand new camera three months ago which now has a successor. so i wasnt speaking for myself.'
further, i bought my camera two months ago when it already had a successor, the g3, like i have already stated in previous posts. that would be why i wasnt worried about losing money on an investment, i bought it used, got a good price, and im not worried about its retail price or resale value dropping. you might also note that my posts were more towards those who buy the latest thing [i assumed [assuming is bad, i realize that so that is probably where im totally wrong in all of this, that buying a new camera every three months would become a pain in the butt sooner or later], and thats that i was focused on more than any - until it came to people not understanding what i meant [and me not being clear some places].
full of spelling errors - approximately one percent of my words is not something i would consider full.
grammar errors - youre right, i dont capitalize the first word of every sentance, proper nouns, et cetera... and then there are those compound sentances. :-d. i came to this thread after reading complaints in another thread concerning new models and people having just bought an s45 and now theyre going to
HAVE to get the latest model - the s50.
e. It doesn't bother me that Canon is releasing new products. What WOULD bother me is if I had to have the latest thing. With Canon coming out with successors (s50 for example) to (what I thought were) new products (s45 for example), I would soon tire of desiring the latest gadgets and I would probably start buying used products.
Now what is bothering me is that people don't understand my simple points. No, I am not saying that Canon's products are terrible, it's clearly obvious that I'm not saying that. I used junk instead of 'stuff.'
f. yes, upset is characterized by smiling when posting. you clearly still think that im 'upset' at canon. thats not correct, i am bothered - and if you want to call it 'upset' you can
- that i have to figure out new ways to explain my thoughts after exhausting other easily understandable explanations already. i do see how some of the ways i stated things can be taken the wrong way, so i am sorry about that.
g. thats not how i meant junk.
h. i dont have any proof, thats just how it would be for me.
i.
j. now i see what you mean by contradictory. i shouldnt have used 'junk' like that, but im serious, i was not referring to quality, i just meant canon stuff. i wouldnt have put phils comments of the g3 and his ratings of it to try to prove that its a piece of trash.
i did not mean to be this misunderstood. this is more than i could have ever imagined possible.
k. exaggeration, yes. thats why it was accompanied with a smiley face - to be a hint that i was exaggerating.
l. yeah, in the s50 threads there are s45 owners talking about buying the s50 now that they see its coming out.
m. i was just saying that in hopes that there would be no more replies.
n. youre correct, and i would hope that the g4 would be better than the g3.
alright, im sure canons survival does not depend on a g4 or anything, so i didnt mean that canon would fall apart if they release a g4 right now. i think that most of this argument has sprung from me saying the part about 'i dont think it would be wise if canon blah blah blah'. shubbies, youre right, they have people who know when to release their stuff. i know theyre doing a better job than i could do. i said the 'wise' part without thinking past being in the position that i would get tired of buying new product after new product. so i was wrong about the not being wise part, im sure theyre a wise company. i also think i see where i confused you in some places as well. i thought i was making sense, its just some things i said like 'wise' and 'junk' that made it seem like i was saying something else. im sorry about that. haha, this thread got way out of hand and im more to blame than anyone im sure. if you want to reply back to some things ive said in this post, feel free, if not, just as good. im tired of this topic, and its exhausted me. it has taught me to be clear and not use ambiguous words, so ill work on that in the future. i really am sorry for all the confusion. i hope it makes more sense now. if it doesnt, then oh well.. i dont have the time to spend here anymore. again, im sorry for all the confusion. have an awesome day, maybe well talk more in the future [hopefully about something different
] bye!!
--
christofurry
http://www.photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=523846 
