Buyer beware on super telephoto lenses

Started Sep 29, 2012 | Discussions thread
Flat view
antonoat Veteran Member • Posts: 3,722
Buyer beware on super telephoto lenses

Approx ten months ago I bought a brand new Nikon 400 f2.8afs vrII lens form Grays of Westminster in London.

After a period of about six months I decided the 400f2.8 was not too practical for my needs so I decided the 300 2.8 VRII would be a suitable replacement.

I contacted Grays to see what they would give me in part exchange, the 400 2.8 was in as new condition, the best they would offer was £4000, bear in mind I had paid £6799 just six months previous.

I was shocked and dumbfounded to say the least, now before anyone jumps on my back

and accuses me of being unrealistic I just want to bring attention to the fact that these super telephoto lenses are in my opinion way over priced/perhaps, but certainly dealer margins/mark-ups are way bigger than many of us suspect and that's taking into account that they have to make a profit on re-sale.

Think long and hard before making such a significant purchase, and realise that you may have spent a small fortune with a particular dealer, at the end of the day it will count for nothing when it comes to trade-in.

This is not sour grapes but considering I could have bought a decent car with what I have spent with them over the years I was totally surprised when I received their meagre valuation.

I have learnt now to spend my hard earned cash more wisely, I wont ever buy from them in the future and will think long and hard before making any significant purchases of camera gear.

You may think what's the point of this thread, it's merely a warning to others to realise

that any camera gear you buy no matter how much the item is supposedly in demand you will lose big time if you want to trade-in!


Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow