12-35mm f/2.8: What's the verdict?

Started Sep 28, 2012 | Discussions thread
tgutgu Veteran Member • Posts: 4,110
Re: So the 14-45 mm has better optical IQ??
1

The lens is half the price of the Canon EF 2.8/24-70mm L II, which does not even has a stabilisator. So the 12-35mm easily wins the value for money race in this comparison.

bluelemmy wrote:

The clear divide on this lens is between people who have bought it and speak from experience. They all seem alike in saying that this is the lens that becomes their staple.

Then there are the people who haven't tried it and are spooked by what they see as a poor quality lens for the price.

The reality is that this is a lens designed for photographers more than pixel peepers. If you are going to pixel peep alongside primes, it will not always match up (no surprise there, it's a zoom).

But as a lens for day to day use, it's a keeper if you can afford it.

-- hide signature --

Thomas

 tgutgu's gear list:tgutgu's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 Olympus E-PL7 Olympus E-M1 II Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS +31 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow