EX2F ISO performance review at IR

Started Sep 25, 2012 | Discussions thread
Chris62 Contributing Member • Posts: 693
Re: EX2F ISO performance review at IR

Photostyle wrote:

I also has this impression, the Canon S100 looks better to me, or is it my eyes only.
the problem could be the Jpeg engine, maybe it can be adjusted ??

logbi77 wrote:

Is it just me or does the ISO 800 and above samples look compressed and weird?

I've compared pictures on ISO 400. No reason to use more with F1,4 lens I think...

For me Canon is not better less detail and CA - see the white border area. under the cup.

These cameras are compact yuo can not changwe optics so why to compare ISO 800 to 800 instead of )) vs 400?

F1,4 vs 2,0 means 1 EV lower ISO on wide range so look to tele range and tell me why Canon is better?
For me EX2 is much better.

The only alternative is LX7 with fast lens 24 mm F1,4!

Do you know other cameras in this class with 24 mm wide range eqv. ? I do not so my choise is only between these two.

RX100 more expensive. OK bigger sensor but slow lens in tele range no 24 mm, no equpment on body for photo accesories simply point & shot not for advanced photographer at all.

 Chris62's gear list:Chris62's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Samsung NX30 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake Samsung NX 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OIS Samsung NX 50-200mm F4-5.6 OIS +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow