Full frame anybody?

Started Sep 16, 2012 | Discussions thread
Louis_Dobson
Louis_Dobson Forum Pro • Posts: 27,361
Re: Full frame anybody?

I went the other way - full frame is too damn bulky, and it's party trick (high ISO) does not interest me. Low ISO image quality is now more or less identical between FF and MFT, but FF is a pain to carry and MFT is not.

Anyone who was avoiding FF for price reasons should now go get it.

Rjansenbr2 wrote:

I have just got a new OM-D and I am really pleased with the images it can produce.

Also the camera is small (althought not pocketable) and very sturdy and nice to use.

I was pretty much convinced that the m43 clearly won the trade off in size x quality against apc-s Dslrs.

But now with the new Nikon D600, I am having some doubts. Will the trade off between size x quality be also justifiable? Why build up an expensive lens system around a m43, if you can get full frame? I know its more expensive, but not that much anymore...

BTW a really like the OM-D but are you also having second thoughts?

 Louis_Dobson's gear list:Louis_Dobson's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G Fisheye 8mm F3.5 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow