35L or 50L as walkaround lens

Started Sep 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
Marcos Villaroman Veteran Member • Posts: 5,145
Pretty Much Matches My Experiences

FWIW, your experiences matches mine.

Before buying my 35L, I had a 35/2, 50/1.4, 100/2, and 24-105. I found I currently like shooting 35mm more than 50mm.

I borrowed a 50L. Really nice lens, but, it does have a lot of glass to move around. Since my 50/1.4 was doing the job quite well, I decided to go for the 35L. There are a number of comparisons between the 50L and 50/1.4 out there --- aside from the belief that the 50/1.4 breaks too easily (mine hasn't so far and I do take care not allow the front element to back drive the focus mechanism).

I like the fact 35mm is slightly wide --- it is more versatile for what I like to do.

I currently use three zoom for focal length convenience: 17-40, 24-105, and 70-200/2.8 IS II.

For shallow DOF/low light, I have the 35L and 85L.

For me, these five L lens gives me the most versatility for what I like to shoot.

Like everyone else on this thread said: you should try both focal lengths and see which one works for you the most. 35mm worked better for me and was worth getting a 35L. For the times when I really want to play with 50mm, my 50/1.4 is currently good enough.

 Marcos Villaroman's gear list:Marcos Villaroman's gear list
Sony RX100 IV Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-T2 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R +48 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow