Mid range zoom

Started Jul 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
Martin_MM Regular Member • Posts: 142
Re: Which 24-85

Wow, had no idea.... here you can clearly see the relativity of the price.

OK, save for Nikon 24-70 then - I think it is definitely worth it (the infamous zoom grindig should be gone by now with the latest series).

chipmaster wrote:

If you are considering Tamron read this and be careful! At least they are known to have a very long warranty


Martin_MM wrote:

David, why not the new Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC...? I´m sure you will appreciate both the image stabilizer and the f2.8 for playing with the depth of field (which is a strong creative aspect in certain situations the 4.5-5.6 zoom cannot really give you).

p.s. Yes, the Sigma 24-70 is not an example of well-done lens... It is really below average in optical quality - don´t spend on it, sooner or later you would regret it. Based on my experience, if a more expensive thing brings a real quality, the initial high (and rather painful for sure) investment becomes soooo relative in the long-term satisfied use...

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow