Re: EX2F availability now September 12, 2012
Billx08 wrote:
The Jacal
wrote:
. . .
Those samples were so bad that they're highly suspect and may have been intended to reduce its desirability. Of course they don't make the EX2F
more
desirable, but anyone that has faith in the validity of those suspect samples is easily gulled.
Time will tell, try not to get a stroke worrying about it in the meantime.
Reading comprehension problems, hmm? What I wrote shows very clearly that those suspect samples aren't worth worrying about.
How are they suspect? I'm not saying they're not, but how do you know?
Because as I wrote, "Those samples were so bad that they're highly suspect". It's not too unusual for new models to produce
slightly
lower IQ, but the operative word that describes the degradation is "
slight
". If you have to ask "how do you know" because you don't see how bad the samples were, that says something about your ability to judge. I think that it's more about rhetoric though since you left yourself an "out" by writing "I'm not saying they're not".
You mentioned "those suspect samples" , not the 'possibly suspect samples' or 'the stragely bad samples', no, it was
those suspect samples
I really don't care if the lunatics start to run the asylum,
nobody
will win. Please open your eyes and
try
and be objective.
I have been. It's
you
that seems to want to run the asylum, after helping snake to turn the forum into an asylum. Your frequently posted "mission" shows only that even without this forum, you're captive in your own internal asylum.
There's the anger.
If I may I would like to remind you of this.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1001&message=42251374