Is 24-70 II worth the price

Started Jul 30, 2012 | Discussions thread
Jon Rty Veteran Member • Posts: 3,838
Re: Nothing's in a vacuum

Yes dear. But you see, the OP isn't interested in sensor performance. He's interested in low-light performance. And low-light performance is as much dependent on the lens as it is on the sensor. You've posted nothing but misplaced criticism, misguided advice and misnamed proof. If you ever do happen to be in a position to instruct anyone, 3 year old or not, please try to know what you're talking about before you open your mouth. Because up until now you've offered no advice of value, and quite a lot of attitude.

graphikal wrote:

Sensor performance is sensor performance. A lens is not a sensor, and a sensor is not a lens. I've posted proof that your assertions are false. I feel like I'm instructing a three-year-old.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
BAK
BAK
BAK
(unknown member)
HSU
BAK
BAK
BAK
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
BAK
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow