Finally got angry about lack of 35mm equivalent

Started Jul 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
EinsteinsGhost Forum Pro • Posts: 11,977
Re: Of 22mm f/2 envy ... not

'yheadofdestiny wrote:

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

headofdestiny wrote:

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

yabokkie wrote:

about Sony 24/1.8, I don't think it is very different from 22/2, other than three things: size, price, and a silly Zeiss brand.

At this point we don't know if the Canon 22/2 can take on Leica 24/2 Summilux-M. We do know that the Sony 24/1.8 can. So, it might be more appropriate to say that similarities between Canon 22/2 and Sony 24/1.8 begin and end with proximity of focal length and maximum aperture in the spec sheet.

The Zeiss isn't THAT incredible, in terms of resolution. It's pretty good, but isn't fantastic at infinity, and the Sigma 30 is better at all comparable apertures.

And where can I see this?

Well, I've owned both lenses, but here is a pretty reputable test:

It may be reputable test when considered individually, but you can't go around comparing MTF50 numbers between lenses unless the same camera is used. I don't think you'd pick Sigma over Leica Summilux just because LensRentals found it to be superior.

 EinsteinsGhost's gear list:EinsteinsGhost's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Sony SLT-A55 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony 135mm F2.8 (T4.5) STF +12 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow