Finally got angry about lack of 35mm equivalent

Started Jul 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
headofdestiny Veteran Member • Posts: 9,226
Re: Of 22mm f/2 envy ... not

EinsteinsGhost wrote:

yabokkie wrote:

about Sony 24/1.8, I don't think it is very different from 22/2, other than three things: size, price, and a silly Zeiss brand.

At this point we don't know if the Canon 22/2 can take on Leica 24/2 Summilux-M. We do know that the Sony 24/1.8 can. So, it might be more appropriate to say that similarities between Canon 22/2 and Sony 24/1.8 begin and end with proximity of focal length and maximum aperture in the spec sheet.

The Zeiss isn't THAT incredible, in terms of resolution. It's pretty good, but isn't fantastic at infinity, and the Sigma 30 is better at all comparable apertures.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
wll
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow