Bad RAW implementation in the NX 20MP cameras!

Started Jul 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
dlacoutu OP Contributing Member • Posts: 811
Re: Bad RAW implementation in the NX 20MP cameras!

paulhome wrote:

This thread starts by comparing an iso800 vs a iso100 shot at -2.6 ev and then +2.6ev pp with the stunning revelation that the shadows are better on the iso800 shot shot at the proper settings than recovering 3ev on iso100,,, durrrrrrrrr. thats how it should be.

it then moves on to examples of awful shots complaining that the nx2** doesnt help them much.

Have you ever tried another digital camera? One that does not date from more than 10 years ago? Doesn't seems so, by your comments...

The last sensor generation is practically iso-less, meaning that you can shot at base iso then post-process your shot to any ISO value you want, without a big quality loss compared to "proper" ISO use.

The test made by Ariston proves it's the case with the NX200's 20MP sensor, but only when the camera does not know which lens it uses .

The problem does not even need an exposure push to be evident... Even in well-exposed tungsten indoor shots, it can arise quite quickly and ruin any hope for a 8x12 print...

 dlacoutu's gear list:dlacoutu's gear list
Samsung NX100 Pentax K-5 Samsung NX200 Pentax smc FA 50mm F1.4 Samsung NX 30mm F2 Pancake +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow