Ex-25 or Raynox 250?

Started Jul 24, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
lightwriter Regular Member • Posts: 174
Ex-25 or Raynox 250?

Hi! I'm sorry for creating another thread so soon, but I have some questions that can only be answered this way. I currently have the Olympus E-300 with the 14-45 mm and 40-150 mm lens (second version), and also the FL-36 R.

I want to try macro photography, but my budget is tight. I can buy the ex-25 extension tube for 65 euros or the Raynox for 50 euros (this one I am not sure yet;I'm waiting confirmation).

What is the best choice? Which one will give me the best results (amplification, image quality) with the lens that I have?

Thanks in advance.

 lightwriter's gear list:lightwriter's gear list
Canon EOS 700D Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5–5.6 IS STM
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow