Canon lens sugestion
I think Canon needs to turn their 55-250 lens into a high quality "L" series lens.
I fully understand the that there is a 28-300 and several 70-200 versions....but my thought is to bypass the so-so (comparitivly speaking) picture quality of the 28-300 and make a 55-250 return picture quality of the EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM.
The 28-300 is just too long to compare to the 70-200 overall quality wise....
AND the "70" part of the 70-200 is just a bit too long for much of the picture taking I do, and the 200 is just barely enough.
Maybe a 28-200 or 28-250 would also work great. But I'd still like the picture quality of the currently...top of the line, EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM.
And for what it might be worth, yes, I do have a copy of the EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM.
Canon needs something new in top of the line lenses...go for something like this Canon.
|AT-6 Harvard by jarud|
from Trainer aircraft
|Monarch butterflies winter roost at Pismo Beach by cjf2|
from Safety in Numbers (Nature)