Some questions about the Tamron 24-70 on a Canon 5D2/5D3
So how does this lens handle:
a) landscapes stopped down? - is it sharp corner to corner?
b) portraits at 70mm wide open, and stopped down? - is the blur nice enough wide open? is it tack sharp stopped down?
c) baby shots around 50mm wide open? - is there enough separation and nice blur?
I guess, apart from having the versatility of a standard zoom, the main reasons I am interested in a 24-70 lens is for landscapes at the wide end, portraits at the tele end, and wide open shots of our daughter. I tried 3 Sigma 50 1.4's and all of them had focus issues on my 5D3. I still have a nifty fity, but am not the biggest fan really, it is just ok.
I upgraded from a 550D + 10-22, but to be honest a lot of the time I found the widest FL (16mm equiv.) to be just too distorted. Sometimes it worked a treat, but I reckon I could live with 24mm. I would get a 17-40 if I craved wider, even though I don't want a lens with soft corners.
I have been waiting for the Canon mk II reviews, but the Tamron looks pretty good as a much cheaper alternative - and for a bit more than the Canon mk II I could also grab a 35L, which would make up for the Tamron's oniony bokeh!
So is the Tamron 24-70 + 35L going to be better than the Canon 24-70 II? I guess only time will tell, but I feel like I am waiting forever!! (and now even longer! :()
Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM | S 50mm f1.4 | Canon 600EX-RT | Nissin Di622 Mark II
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Jul 5, 2012|
|Jul 6, 2012|
|Jul 6, 2012|
|IMG_8168ABCD by citori525|
|McKinley meadow by TimR32225|
from Natural meadows
|Flare-well to a Classic Flying Machine by cjf2|
from Flying Machines
|_DSC2146 by jerste|
from Helios-44 II
|Leopoldsteinersee by RaCor|
from Landscape - Colour #3