Autofluorescent bug :D
René Schuster wrote:
Looks good but sounds like a lot of complicated hard work!
It is not too bad. Once the specimen is mounted (embedded in agarose) in the scanner and the exposure set the image acquisition is fully automatic. The back projection was quick and dirty and so was the Imaris work.
My "not-so-scientific" approach to a Gluehwuermchen from 7 years ago, with a 2MP UZI and maybe an MCON-40:
You just need another 398 captures...
EDIT: Funny, first I tried to post this with the word "Gluehwuermchen" (glowworm, firefly) spelled the German way, means with "ü" instead of that workaround "ue", but dpr told me they "don't allow that kind of language here"! LOL!
(But, my dear dpr system: if I really wanted to post it with "ü" I knew how to do it!)
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Flower in flower by atdigit|
from Random Items Challenge 26
|Surface tension by atdigit|
from Right in the middle
|A Normal Dat at Thomas's Clap 2016-9379 by Andrew Maltzoff|
from Show us SCHOOL!