5d Mark III low iso poor performance.

Started Jun 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
David Hull
David Hull Veteran Member • Posts: 6,326
Re: Same old same old yep same old tech since 2003

Mikael Risedal wrote:

Why not
24/1,4mk2
35/1,4
85/1.2MK2
24-70/2.8
70-200 2,8 MK2 FAVORIT
300/2,8IS FAVORIT
100MM MACRO
AND SO ON

5D AND 5DMK2 WAS VERY GOOD CAMERAS . BUT NOW CANON is behind in the DEVELOPMENT OF new SENSORS

But so what really?

Hans Kruse wrote:

Mikael Risedal wrote:

Why?

Im also a Canon owner, why would I be happy with Canon's old sensor technology FROM 2003 IN THE YEAR 2012 ?

But why are you a Canon owner then? Makes no sense to me.

Hans Kruse wrote:

Mikael Risedal wrote:

an old sensor technology and old readout that can not keep up in today's context = Canon sensors

canon fan boys have trouble distinguishing between Canon's other positive attributes and the sensor technology

And you repeat forever the same Why not post on the Nikon forum?

Useful here is to advise on the best use of the technology in our hands. All technology has weak areas and until Canon makes a different sensor there really is no point in repeating the same over and over.

-- hide signature --

Life is a battle wishes aunt Titti

-- hide signature --

Life is a battle wishes aunt Titti

 David Hull's gear list:David Hull's gear list
Canon EOS M5 Canon EOS R
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tmr
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow