5d Mark III low iso poor performance.

Started Jun 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
David Hull
David Hull Veteran Member • Posts: 6,254
Re: Maybe next time, avoid the hyperbole and provocation

studio311 wrote:

Mikael, imo, you're "right" overall but you're going way "over the top". Canon does not make "junk", far from it.

That's where the fanboy Hyperbole comes in

Mikael Risedal wrote:
nope because of a poor read out from Canon with high read out noise

Is it to blame others who can do the read out much better and even if the motive is under exposed ? as Nikon/Sony?

I LOVE to see 1dx raw files and from low iso. The last nail in the coffin of Canon's sensor junk?
This is 2012

Hans Kruse wrote:

Rick Knepper wrote:

and you'll probably avoid the fanboi counter-insurgency (as some of the subject lines in the replies would suggest).

I can't comment on your tech problem as there is no real information provided here.

RAWs were posted and about 2 stops underexposed which is not good on a Canon

-- hide signature --

Life is a battle wishes aunt Titti

 David Hull's gear list:David Hull's gear list
Canon EOS M5 Canon EOS R
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tmr
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow