5d Mark III low iso poor performance.

Started Jun 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
gigamel Regular Member • Posts: 178
You dont need Sony-Exmor tech to have clean shadows

Here you can see the difference between the 2008, D700 and the 2012, 5D3
The 5D3 looks like crap at +4

http://dslr-check.info/2012/0511_5D3_ISO200+4EV.jpg

http://dslr-check.info/2012/0511_D700_ISO200+4EV.jpg

And that despite the read noise, DR and SNR being about equal for the two cameras, somehow Canon cant make a camera with clean ISO 100 - Nikon can, even without the use of Sony-Exmor tech

That is why Lloyd Chambers concluded about the 5D3:

"I am glad I shoot both Nikon and Canon— the Canon gear can stay in the drawer with silica gel for long term storage. Having recently reviewed the Canon 5D Mark III, the difference in color and detail isn’t even in the same league; the D800 is so far ahead that the 5DM3 simply does not merit consideration for those considering one or the other."

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2012/20120405_2-D800-examples2.html

"As for the Canon 5D Mark III, it’s no longer April Fools day. I will give Canon another chance with the 1D X."

http://diglloyd.com/articles/LensAndCameraIssues/PushingTheBlacks.html

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tmr
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow