5d Mark III low iso poor performance.

Started Jun 20, 2012 | Discussions thread
Alexandros Trichos
OP Alexandros Trichos Junior Member • Posts: 41
Re: Take it back

All I want to know is if this is a flaw by design or a defective copy.

For my, quality-wise, this is a flaw either way.

But if it is by design, I can't see why the community is blind such a serious shortcoming.
Am I the only one who cares about 100% crop quality?

Hello , noise and banding from ISO100 on a nearly-flagship 3.5k product ???

Why? And where the h*ll is the fantastic noise performance it is supposed to have?

I don't know... And believe my this is not a flame war or anything, I am canon to the bone, with a good investment in gear.

I am not a liar, my 350d did better in this respect! And all I wanted was top-notch quality, thats why I hot the 5dIII...

If this is a bad copy though, things are different...

 Alexandros Trichos's gear list:Alexandros Trichos's gear list
Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L USM Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
tmr
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow