Camera bag for m4/3?

Started Jun 16, 2012 | Discussions thread
leo9 Regular Member • Posts: 210
Re: Billingham Hadley Small with OM-D

hfg wrote:

leo9 wrote:

Michael Kaufman wrote:

The Hadley small and the OM-D are a great combination.

Michael, I've been considering the Hadley Small but I'm concerned about the bag's depth of 7 cm. The height of the EM-5 with landscape grip is 10 cm, so isn't that a bit of a squeeze?

The published dimensions of the Hadley series are very confusing. The Billingham Small and Pro are shaped like a " D " when viewed from above. The published 2.75" depth spec is the depth on the sides of the bags ... the 2 centered dividers are 3.5" deep (4" on the Pro). That allows a larger camera body to easily occupy the center section of the bag, while lenses, being somewhat smaller and round shaped, easily occupy both of the outer sections.

OK, that makes sense to have the centre section slightly deeper, thanks for the clarification.

 leo9's gear list:leo9's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 Sony FE 55mm F1.8 Sony FE 70-200 F4 Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS Zeiss Batis 85mm F1.8
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow