Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are we sure though? Focus shift isn't uncommon, but this lens appears to have more of an issue with it.I am guessing that the perceived focus issue is with the D800's known to be defective AF system and not with the lens. It was probably inappropriate for the reviewer to test this lens with a known to be problematic brand new camera. Ridiculous.
No, this shouldn't have anything to do with it.I am guessing that the perceived focus issue is with the D800's known to be defective AF system and not with the lens. It was probably inappropriate for the reviewer to test this lens with a known to be problematic brand new camera. Ridiculous.
--I just double checked what the reviewer wrote about focus shift. I tested on a D90 instead of my D800 just to be sure.
Yes very strong focus shift to the back.![]()
![]()
--I am guessing that the perceived focus issue is with the D800's known to be defective AF system and not with the lens. It was probably inappropriate for the reviewer to test this lens with a known to be problematic brand new camera. Ridiculous.
I only tested on the D90 as my D800 is off to nikon because of the left af point issue.thanks for that
which aperture range do you see it over ?
+ how do you find corner to corner sharpness on f8 (on the D800) ?
thanks
--
http://www.haroldmiller.me
Yes but on this lens the shift is big.Focus shift is a common feature in uncorrected lenses. Photographers learn to deal with it.
Yes, apparently. I would personally avoid the lens because I don't want to have to deal with it. Others may choose differently.Yes but on this lens the shift is big.Focus shift is a common feature in uncorrected lenses. Photographers learn to deal with it.
I rated the reviewer's ability as "poor" when I noticed part of the review appears to involve a long discredited 45 degree narrow black line targetThe focus shift is bad news indeed.
Thanks for the link.
The focus shift is bad news indeed.
No, the normal phase detect autofocus establishes the correct focus always when the lens is wide open. As far as I know there is no compensation for focus shifts with specific lenses, but you are right, this would be therotecially possible.Is focus shift taken care of by the AF electronics - it knows the focus distance and the aperture to be used for the exposure so can it compensate?
No, if the lens is correctly calibrated shots wide open will focus correctly. The problem is that shots stopped down a little (f/4-f/5.6) will be misfocused. If stopped down beyond f/8 the misfocus will be hidden because of the deeper depth of field.I've seen some sharp shots from this lens wide open - would these not suffer from focus shift it the AF system did not compensate for it?
You should send your 28/1.8 back to Nikon too - it clearly suffers from the same fault as the lens Camera Labs reviewed. My 28/1.8 performs properly - i.e. it sharpens up as I stop down from 1.8, to 2 to 2.8. to 4 to 5.6. A lens that gets softer as it is stopped down is unusable.I only tested on the D90 as my D800 is off to nikon because of the left af point issue.
The focus shift was clearly visible at F4 and strongest at F5.6. At F8 it seemed to be a bit better, but could be simply due to a deeper DOF.
Thank you for the explanation.The AF "grabs focus" at either f2.8 (central AF zones, when an f2.8 or faster lens is used) or f5.6 (outer AF zones, or any lens slower than f2.8). It uses two pretty tightly focused portions of the exit pupil at +/- 5 degrees from perpendicular (f5.6) or +/- 10 degrees (f2.8).
It then does "compensate" for focus shift by applying the lens's default "focus tuning" to get a focus offset for wider apertures, and any correction the user has dialed in, so, depending on how Nikon set the default and how the user adjusted focus, you could be correct at f1.4 and off at 5.6, or off at 1.4 and correct at 5.6. The former is more likely, as Nikon calibrates fast lenses to be correct wide open.
I think what the reviewer meant is that the lens is worse in this regard than other lenses.In any case, there will be a focus shift between wide open and stopped down on pretty much every lens. Which brings us to...
That sort of blows your credibility as a reviewer, because it's a well-documented characteristic of many lenses, seen pretty strongly in all double Guass variations, such as the Nikon 50mm f1.4 AF-D.
- I've never seen a similar behavior before.
Are you sure your lens does not front focus a little bit wide open?My 28/1.8 performs properly - i.e. it sharpens up as I stop down from 1.8, to 2 to 2.8. to 4 to 5.6. A lens that gets softer as it is stopped down is unusable.
You're welcome.Thank you for the explanation.The AF "grabs focus" at either f2.8 (central AF zones, when an f2.8 or faster lens is used) or f5.6 (outer AF zones, or any lens slower than f2.8). It uses two pretty tightly focused portions of the exit pupil at +/- 5 degrees from perpendicular (f5.6) or +/- 10 degrees (f2.8).
It then does "compensate" for focus shift by applying the lens's default "focus tuning" to get a focus offset for wider apertures, and any correction the user has dialed in, so, depending on how Nikon set the default and how the user adjusted focus, you could be correct at f1.4 and off at 5.6, or off at 1.4 and correct at 5.6. The former is more likely, as Nikon calibrates fast lenses to be correct wide open.
I've often wondered that, myself.So, fast lenses are usually calibrated for correct focus wide open and the ones with big focus shifts will then be off when shot at f/4 or f/5.6. Why can the built-in focus offset not change with different apertures?
I have trouble picturing any lens from the 2010s being worse than a 50mm f1.4 from the 1950s.I think what the reviewer meant is that the lens is worse in this regard than other lenses.In any case, there will be a focus shift between wide open and stopped down on pretty much every lens. Which brings us to...
That sort of blows your credibility as a reviewer, because it's a well-documented characteristic of many lenses, seen pretty strongly in all double Guass variations, such as the Nikon 50mm f1.4 AF-D.
- I've never seen a similar behavior before.
It is. Has been for years.I'm starting to feel that this is a serious issue with fast prime lenses.
Perhaps it makes indeed sense to use those almost always wide open (or stopped down to at least f/8). Slower (zoom) lenses may have the unexpected advantage of less focus shift, producing better results at f/2.8-f/5.6. BTW, my only Nikon lens with no detectable focus shift at all is the 60/2.8 macro.
it deosn't 'soften up'. The plane of focus shifts backwards. btw: a typical symptom of uncorrected spherical aberrations. In this case i have the suspicion it's deliberate then another 'symptom' is a very smooth creamy bokeh, which the 28 does have.You should send your 28/1.8 back to Nikon too - it clearly suffers from the same fault as the lens Camera Labs reviewed. My 28/1.8 performs properly - i.e. it sharpens up as I stop down from 1.8, to 2 to 2.8. to 4 to 5.6. A lens that gets softer as it is stopped down is unusable.I only tested on the D90 as my D800 is off to nikon because of the left af point issue.
The focus shift was clearly visible at F4 and strongest at F5.6. At F8 it seemed to be a bit better, but could be simply due to a deeper DOF.