70-200 2.8L non-IS

Started May 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
69chevy Senior Member • Posts: 1,617
Re: 70-200 2.8L non-IS

I own the 70-200 2.8 Non IS. I wanted to see if the hype measured up. I rented a new IS mkII for comparison. I literally found no differences at any end of the zoom range.

However, I do not own an IS lens, and always am very consious of my technique. I can imagine if you shoot in low light often, the IS could save you some ISO room.

Regardless, the Non IS version is a STEAL at around $900 used. You cannot buy a better lens for the money! I shoot weddings, portraits and sports with it. I wouldn't upgrade to the IS mkII version even if I had money to burn.

Just find your slowest hand held SS at 200mm and don't go below it.

 69chevy's gear list:69chevy's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EF 16-35mm F4L IS USM +1 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow