70-200 2.8L non-IS

Started May 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
Stilograph Regular Member • Posts: 304
Re: 70-200 2.8L non-IS

I have the non-IS version, my friend has IS Mk I. We did a comparison back in back. Conclusion was indeed, that the non IS was a little bit slower when focusing on rapidly moving subjects, birds and such. But we could not see the diffrence in static shots.

One thing I do remember though, is that when using 200mm focal length, IS was helpful when framing the shot.

Don't know about the IS Mk II, never used it.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow