I finally 'get' equivalence

Started May 22, 2012 | Discussions thread
Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 41,916
Re:Are you sure you finally 'get' equivalence?

s_grins wrote:

Quantum mechanics do not apply to equivalence.

In fact, it does. The total amount of light that falls on the sensor is measured in photons, which are a construct of QM. In addition, photon noise, which is the dominant source of noise outside the shadows, is the square root of the number of photons recorded -- again, a statistical result from QM.

Quantum mechanics do exist, equivalence does not. There is no evidence it does, whatsoever. Webpage maybe exist, equivalence does not.

And yet:

http://ezstrobesphoto.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-d300-and-d700-equivalent-images_25.html

http://www.seriouscompacts.com/f41/panasonic-g1-nikon-d700-iso-shootout-160/

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=31236433

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=16107908

'Twould seem that Equivalence not only exists, but works as advertised.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow