What's A57 advantages over A65?

Started May 14, 2012 | Discussions thread
philbot Contributing Member • Posts: 846
Re: What about flash exposure?

ET2 wrote:

philbot wrote:

Well put!

Nothing was well "put" .. The $1200 A77 is only $300 more than the $900 A65. If A65 is worth $200 more than the $700 A57, then A77 is for sure worth $300 more than A65... .

As I said , for people with tighter budget, A57 could be a better deal. Different people have a different tolerance point on how much they want to spend on a camera that will become an outdated model in a couple of years.

His sentiment is well put, you seem to have gone all pedantic on this..

I have an A77, I have no issues in recommending the A65 or A57 as a cheaper alternative, all he was pointing out is that people should not delude themselves into thinking the A57 is universally better then the A65 and an educated decision needs to be made based on individual value for money..

I sense you are arguing different points.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ET2
ET2
ET2
ET2
ET2
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow