Olympus M5 - IBIS vs OIS with Pana 100-300 / Pana 14-45

Started May 11, 2012 | Discussions thread
luisflorit Veteran Member • Posts: 7,855
Re: This is why...

Chez Wimpy wrote:

luisflorit wrote:

Probably Pany did something wrong with the original 100-300 firmware, since I remember that even the old FZ50 OIS was great (no problem handholding at 720mm equiv. and 1/250s).

I think they had a problem with both their telephoto zooms. The 45-200 improved dramatically with the (same?) firmware adjustment a few months ago. I now shoot at 1/FL and all but guaranteed sharp images. I get about 4-stops at the limit, which is a few stops better than I manage with my 70-200/2.8IS Canon (much older IS "firmware").

1/2FL is what you should expect without OIS, so 1/FL is not a really good thing, unless you've shaky hands. I shoot at 1/3FL with my FZ50+1.7TC (in particular, the camera didn't even know I had a TC attached).

For example, I took this at 420mm, 1/100s (downsized, but the original is perfectly focused too):

MMmm... maybe I used a tree for this one...??


-- hide signature --

My gallery: http://luis.impa.br/photo/new

Oly E5/E3 + 12-60 + 50-200 + EC14 + EC20 + FL50R
Pany FZ50 + Oly FL50 + TCON17 + Raynox 150 & 250

 luisflorit's gear list:luisflorit's gear list
Olympus E-M1 Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm 1:2.8-3.5 SWD Olympus Zuiko Digital 2.0x Teleconverter EC-20 Olympus Zuiko Digital 1.4x Teleconverter EC-14 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow