Sharper wide open: Mirrorless or DSLR?

Started May 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
Anders W Forum Pro • Posts: 21,466
Re: I have an answer for you

Great Bustard wrote:

Jun2 wrote:

OK, I read 50mm f1.4 review. The center is sharp, the edge is very soft. Since she is off center, it explains the softness. That lens is a dog for full frame.

Well, the edges are horrible, but the center is kicking. The Nikon 50 / 1.4G gives a more balanced performance:,52&fullscreen=true&av=2,2&fl=50,50&vis=VisualiserSharpnessMTF,VisualiserSharpnessMTF&stack=horizontal&&config=/lensreviews/widget/LensReviewConfiguration.xml%3F4

In any case, 50mm f/2 on FF is equivalent to 25mm f/1 on mFT, so...

Unless you want to compensate for the poor resolution in RAW by means of extra sharpening, thus losing the FF noise advantage. Or compare optical performance by means of Photozone reviews. Then f/2 on FF becomes equivalent to f/2 on MFT.

 Anders W's gear list:Anders W's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus E-M1 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-45mm F3.5-5.6 ASPH OIS Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH +28 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow