Canon 55-250 IS vs. 70-300 IS
Get the 55-250mm IS. It's a decent lens for what you're doing. I bought one several months ago and have had no regrets. The butterfly picture was taken handheld, with a Canon Speedlite 320EX to fill in the shadows.
Thanks for all of your replies. It seems that many are happy with both of these lenses and there's not a whole lot of bad things to say about them.
I'll probably get the 55-250----what the 55-250 has going for it for me is:
1) Smaller / lighter
2) Only $100 (vs $300 for the 70-300 IS) (these are the prices I'm getting because of rebates)
3) Better minimum focusing distance for "macro" (1:3).
Looks like the 70-300 IS might be sharper in the longer end, but I'm not sure how significant that will be for my use (daytime use: for occasional outdoor wildlife in my backyard, the trip to the zoo, or taking photos of family outdoors from a distance).
I could always spend the $200 toward another lens in the future in the lower FL's that I'll be using more.
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Apr 27, 2012|
|Apr 28, 2012||1|
|Apr 28, 2012|
|Apr 30, 2012|
|Apr 28, 2012|
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%