Why are USM II super teles so expensive?

Started Apr 26, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
SergioSpain Contributing Member • Posts: 509
Why are USM II super teles so expensive?

I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the USM and USM II super telephotos who can tell me whether the incredible mark-up of the II versus the I, or over their Nikon counterparts, for that matter, is worth it. On Adorama's website, for example, I see that the Canon 400 2.8 USM II costs $11,500, whereas the Nikon equivalent is "only" $9,000. I know with these lenses you usually get what you pay for, but are you really getting 25% more with the USM II lens?

 SergioSpain's gear list:SergioSpain's gear list
Nikon D700 Nikon D4 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/2.8G ED-IF VR +5 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow