Is there any sane reason... BIG FILE!

Started Apr 19, 2012 | Discussions thread
Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee
OP Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee Veteran Member • Posts: 6,081

Daniel Clune wrote:

What if you had shot a landscape scene with small trees in background and wanted those trees on a large print to be visable rather than just MUSH.

I'd be obsessional, and I'm not. Would you send back a Rembrandt or a Leonarda and ask for more detail. Image is what matters, not ultradetail.

Or how about your shooting wildlife and you are allready useing a 800mm lens but still need to crop, again more rez could be very handy.

It could be, but sneaking closer which is what wildlife photographers do, is more effective.

Just because 21 meg is enough for you sure doesnt mean it applies to others. You have to come out of that bubble your in and realize others might need other things from there equipment.

I'm resisiting the urge to correct the spelling! We all type incorrectly..

-- hide signature --

I looked at your Pbase Gallery.
You didn't need huge megapixels for them now, did you??!!

-- hide signature --

Níor bhris focal maith fiacail riamh (Irish Gaelic)
A good word never broke a tooth.

 Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list:Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Fujifilm X10 Panasonic FZ1000 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 Sony Alpha NEX-7 +27 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow