Sigma 17-70 & Tamron 70-300 VC "or" Canon 24-105L

Started Apr 18, 2012 | Discussions thread
MX_shooter Regular Member • Posts: 220
Re: the duo or something else

The 17-70 is better than the 24-105 on the 60d.

Ive had both . Dont be blinded by the L. Your 60d isnt even weather sealed so the 24-105 offers nothing.:)

bronxbombers wrote:

mibu2011 wrote:

On a 60D. Cost of the Sigma and the Tamron together is virtually the same as the 24-105 L on its own.

24-105 isn't that wide and it's not even anything special for sharpness, my tamron 17-50 and 28-75 were better and cost less and the 17-50 went wider and both had faster aperture. they lack IS but if oyu want IS what about canon 15-85 IS or 17-55 IS or sigma 17-50 2.8 OS?

between the two options you mention siUgma 17-70+tamr 70-300 vc gives a lot wider coverage than 24-105

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow