DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Samsung WB750 new review

Started Apr 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
swhs Regular Member • Posts: 113
Re: Samsung WB750 new review

jj74e wrote:

what a randomly timed review.

also, while the review is positive, that website seems to be positive about most cameras anyway. however, teh 750 does look like a solid camera.

The only website I've seen that actually says it does not recommend cameras in lots of cases, esp. compact cameras, is digitalcamerainfo.com, see:

http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/d/Digital-Camera-Reviews.htm

A website where the final value judgement is mostly worthless is photographyblog.com, as no camera review I've seen there, ever rated a camera as less than 'above average'. So where are the average and below average cameras then? Don't they write up reviews for those or is the whole 'above average' and star system basically worthless? I think both. Bad stuff needs to be identified and websites unwilling to do this give a bias as if all equipment is good and that it's mostly up to your wishes in features etc. to select a camera.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow