Need help shuffling my lens setup

Started Apr 3, 2012 | Discussions thread
Flat view
treepop Contributing Member • Posts: 691
Need help shuffling my lens setup

My current setup:

Flashes:430ex ii 580ex ii
Bodies: 5D2 60D

Crop Lenses: 11-16 2.8, tamron 17-50 (nonVC), Sigma 30 1.4
FF Lenses: 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75, 70-200 IS II

I am looking to sell off my crop gear and go with dual 5D2's. I really need the low light performance from it for low light photog and with the massive drop in price of the 5D2, now seems like the right time. I don't care about the lost reach of the 1.6 crop.

My humble predictions are that I get the following:
$700 for the 60D
$380 for the 30 1.4
$550 for the 11-16
$300 for the 17-50

This gives me an additional ~$1930 to spend on a 5DMark 2 (Used ~$1500) and some lenses (~$430 left after 5D2 + $1170(needed do to 24 & 35 mentioned later = $1600 for lenses)

I really like primes and am not a big fan of zooms. This will be primarily for wedding shooting. I care more about tack sharp focus and corner to corner sharpness.

Here are some of the lenses I am thinking:

Another 50 1.8 (I shoot with a partner and share lenses) ~$100 (great edge to edge sharpness. tack sharp albeit not the fastest focus speed) the 1.4 isn't as sharp and the 1.2 is a lot more expensive. I felt this was a place for compromise.

24 II or 35 1.4 ~$1300 (This is killing my budget). Sure they are sharp relatively wide and FAST, but man they cost a fortune. Also I wont be able to get as wide as with my 11-16 on a croppy.

85 1.8 ~$300. Been eying this for a while. It would enable me and partner to shoot portraits at the same time. 1.2 is too slow for me. EDIT I am willing to drop this lens if it will enable me to cover the wide/mid range better. and Just swap with partner for 70-200 IS II if everyone feels this is a more viable option.

~$1600 out of pocket (would love to cut this down)

The truth is I want to limit my out of pocket and still cover a nice range. The only alternatives I see to the 24 and 35 are the canon 28 1.8 and canon 35 2.0. The 28 is WAY too soft @ the corners. The 35 is okay sharpness wise, but it has some horrid bokeh, from what I have seen. Octagonal and such.

Any input would be great. I may be missing something, which is why I am crowd sourcing to see if there is a flaw in my thinking. I honestly think the Tamron 28-75 is OKAY, but it's just not as sharp as the 70-200 or the 50 1.8. I love sharp, but have found zooms IN GENERAL (excluding the 70-200 IS II) to be much less tack sharp. Also I like the idea of faster primes. It puts less strain on my shutter speed and ISO. I like staying around 1600 if possible. 3200 in an emergency and 6400 if I just can't miss a shot.

Thanks for the help!
never stop learning

 treepop's gear list:treepop's gear list
Canon PowerShot S90 Canon EOS 5D Mark II Sony a6300 Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM +15 more
Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 60D
If you believe there are incorrect tags, please send us this post using our feedback form.
Flat view
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow