EF-S 17-55 Priced Too High?

Started Mar 18, 2012 | Discussions thread
plantdoc Senior Member • Posts: 2,994
Re: EF-S 17-55 Priced Too High?

If people are willing to buy it, then it's not priced too high, at least from a bean counters viewpoint. It's seems expensive to me, compared to the 24-104L or what I paid for a 28-70L 2.8. Also, a lens that produces a larger, high quality image (full frame), usually costs more. Look at the complex lens designs used in $400 superzoom cameras. At least, Canon should include a lens hood and case in this price range. Just my .02

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow