EF-S 17-55 Priced Too High?

Started Mar 18, 2012 | Discussions thread
OP Poxywallow New Member • Posts: 7
Re: EF-S 17-55 Priced Too High?

I don't think comparisons to the 24-70 F/2.8 L II are fair because it's a version two that is recently released. The version I is selling for $1300 now, which is only 200 bucks more than the EF-S. The price on the 24-70 II will drop with time, just like with the 70-200 2.8II. Though I doubt it will go all the way down to $1300, I don't see a future of 2k+ for it.

theatrus wrote:

Considering that the 24-70 f/2.8 II (the closest full frame alternative) is running $2300, I would consider the 17-55 comparatively priced.

Yes, it could be built up to L standards externally, but I'd imagine that the price would climb to compensate.
Warning: The internet is filled with one sided views. Stay objective.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow