5dIII a DUD for landscape photographers

Started Mar 14, 2012 | Discussions thread
steve ohlhaber Regular Member • Posts: 468
Re: 5dIII a DUD for landscape photographers

Thats what I wonder. Also, how did Nikon take a totally different approach. Does Nikon think there actually are more people that are doing landscapes. Does Nikon think they can seel more cameras with more pixels than with less. Somehow one of the top camera makers seems to be producing exactly what the canon landscape photographers want. Why did nikon make such a different choice. Were they stupid and messed up and made a camera with too many pixels. Are they the ones at fault here. Its not 10 people saying we want more pixels. Apparently, Nikon actual did it, they made an affordable camera with a lot of pixels. So, why did a major maker go this way when canon didnt. It sounds like everyone here on this site thinks its because nikon screwed up and nobody actually wants 36 megapixels and they will suffer and have low sales.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
MM1
(unknown member)
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow