5dIII a DUD for landscape photographers

Started Mar 14, 2012 | Discussions thread
mischivo Contributing Member • Posts: 620
16 x 24, Only?

I've had a professional lab make prints of equal size from scanned 35mm strips of Kodak Ektar 100. And although my scanner scans at about 21-22 megapixels, I know that for a fact, it out-resolves the emulsion itself. I'd say the stock has an actual resolution of 10-14 megapixels. Despite all of this, my prints look great. How close are you viewing your prints at?

-- hide signature --

cinematography :: http://paulkounine.com/cine
photography :: http://pavelkounine.com

I shoot film. I shoot digital. Both are great in their own ways. The nice thing about film is that I can always have the most advanced imaging technology around packed into my 20 year old camera. That's one aspect of digital that I loathe.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow