5dIII a DUD for landscape photographers

Started Mar 14, 2012 | Discussions thread
Randplaty Contributing Member • Posts: 504
Re: 5dIII a DUD for landscape photographers

Skiwi33 wrote:

Randplaty wrote:

Skiwi33 wrote:

I "get" the argument, but to me it misses the point,

I have an iPad2. It works fine. I don't need more Mpix. But in the back of my mind is the little voice that says "but it COULD be more useful". Which is why I will buy an iPad3..

With all due respect to these arguments, every step change in resolution has bought these arguments forth. They are worth no more now than they were then.

So you don't want to talk about landscape photographers? Ok we can change the topic.

Why don't you ever think... oooh this camera COULD be more useful with better AF? Or ooh this camera COULD be more useful with more fps? It's the same argument... it's just which one of those specs are more interesting to you.

Huh? I was talking landscape photography, hence my concentration on Mpix. AF, FPS that you raise, now you're changing the topic....

You said you get the argument but it doesn't make sense. The argument was that there simply aren't enough landscape photographers and they were the ones left out of the 5D3s improvements. The argument was never, that you don't need megapixels.

So you were switching the topic from the # of landscape photographers vs other photographers to the topic of whether we "could" use more megapixels or not.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow