How good is the Nikon 70-200VRII compared to its Canon counterpart?

Started Feb 11, 2012 | Discussions thread
sfnikon Senior Member • Posts: 2,278
Re: How good is the Nikon 70-200VRII compared to its Canon counterpart?

The Nikkor is clearly optimized for the close to moderate ranges, and is nearly unbeatable there. Conversely, the Canon seems to be optimized for the moderate to far, and is extremely good there. And of course, it's at different focal lengths too. So if I'm a fashion shooter, I'm with the Nikon, if I'm shooting wildlife or things at longer range, the Canon. Neither is "bad" at the other, just differing strengths. Both represent near state of the art designs with different apparent design goals. If anytthe Nikon is definitely beating the Canon in the closer range work

The first time I'm hearing this but I'm not surprised. I use the 70-200VR2 at close to moderate range most of the time and are blown away by how good it is. I remember I did comparison shots at f/2.8 against the 200VR when I first got the zoom and had a very hard time seeing a difference.

-- hide signature --


 sfnikon's gear list:sfnikon's gear list
Panasonic LX100 Nikon D3 Nikon D810 Nikon D500 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED +22 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow