Kurt Munger Tamron 18-200 e-mount review

El Matadurr

Veteran Member
Messages
4,918
Solutions
5
Reaction score
528
Location
KY, US
I like how he makes note of the panorama issue, but also how it is a near identical performer to the Sony version, but that the VC works better than SSS. Hmmm...
 
I like how he makes note of the panorama issue, but also how it is a near identical performer to the Sony version, but that the VC works better than SSS. Hmmm...
In Sony DSLR & SLT cameras, does not say in Mirror-less cameras.

I have read here, reports that the Sony 18-200mm stabilizes better in video because of the larger glass provides more movement.

For me it is no contest, unless you are really short of cash, even then save up for an extra couple of months. Get the one developed by the camera maker.

An old saying that comes to mind....."Quality remains long after price is forgotten." :)
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
 
I like how he makes note of the panorama issue, but also how it is a near identical performer to the Sony version, but that the VC works better than SSS. Hmmm...
In Sony DSLR & SLT cameras, does not say in Mirror-less cameras.

I have read here, reports that the Sony 18-200mm stabilizes better in video because of the larger glass provides more movement.

For me it is no contest, unless you are really short of cash, even then save up for an extra couple of months. Get the one developed by the camera maker.

An old saying that comes to mind....."Quality remains long after price is forgotten." :)
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
6 year (Tammy) vs 1 year (Sony) warranty...
:P
 
it's not just about price. in practice the Tamron is the better fit for the "compactness" of NEX system. I'm sure the Sony lens is great but unless you prioritize video or worry a whole lot about resale value, I would recommend the tamron
I like how he makes note of the panorama issue, but also how it is a near identical performer to the Sony version, but that the VC works better than SSS. Hmmm...
In Sony DSLR & SLT cameras, does not say in Mirror-less cameras.

I have read here, reports that the Sony 18-200mm stabilizes better in video because of the larger glass provides more movement.

For me it is no contest, unless you are really short of cash, even then save up for an extra couple of months. Get the one developed by the camera maker.

An old saying that comes to mind....."Quality remains long after price is forgotten." :)
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
--
http://kev777zero.artistswanted.org/
http://www.wix.com/drkevinlyu/photography
 
6 year (Tammy) vs 1 year (Sony) warranty...
:P
Good point but in reality how many people have problems with their lens, other than not sharp enough, soft corners etc from day one, you then take it back straight away.
--
http://www.youtube.com/user/relate2
True true, but you never know when a motor will go out, or an internal component may loosen/break/etc. In actuality, a longer warranty isn't truly necessary, but for peace of mind, a longer one is great to have.
 
it's not just about price. in practice the Tamron is the better fit for the "compactness" of NEX system.
EXACTLY! People sort of forget just how much smaller the Tamron really is in comparison. Spec-wise, little difference, but a couple millimeters in the hand can make a huge difference in the ergonomics of any device.
 
"Bokeh. Mostly harsh at all focal lengths. Look below for sample crops."

Hmm.

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lng0004/
If you take a look at his SEL18200 review he says a similar thing "Bokeh is somewhat harsh at both ends with a wide open aperture, producing a noticeable ring and point in highlights, that's typical for less expensive zooms."

Although it's worth noting that he says that it improves a bit one stop down, but directly comparing the Tamron and Sony bokeh versions, I see very, very little difference, but wide open the Tamron takes the cake (though they are two different pictures).
 
6 year (Tammy) vs 1 year (Sony) warranty...
:P
Good point but in reality how many people have problems with their lens, other than not sharp enough, soft corners etc from day one, you then take it back straight away.
Many years ago I had a Tamron zoom develop a mechanical problem after three years of use, it was great to have it fixed free of charge. And I'm now wishing my Canon 24-105mm L lens had a six year warranty!
 
6 year (Tammy) vs 1 year (Sony) warranty...
:P
Good point but in reality how many people have problems with their lens, other than not sharp enough, soft corners etc from day one, you then take it back straight away.
Many years ago I had a Tamron zoom develop a mechanical problem after three years of use, it was great to have it fixed free of charge. And I'm now wishing my Canon 24-105mm L lens had a six year warranty!
+1, exactly!
 
it's not just about price. in practice the Tamron is the better fit for the "compactness" of NEX system. I'm sure the Sony lens is great but unless you prioritize video or worry a whole lot about resale value, I would recommend the tamron
an important factor judging by so many responses that mention this!! :)

jpr2
--
~
street candids (non-interactive):
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157609618638319/
music and dance:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341265280/
B&W:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157623306407882/
wildlife & macro:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341377106/
interactive street:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157623181919323/

Comments and critique are always welcome!
~
 
Hello again, and here it is: http://kurtmunger.com/tamron_nex_18_200mm_f_3_5_6_3id317.html

Next he will be reviewing the Sony 55-210.
I saw this guy's review of the SEL 18200. Except for flare and ghosting, it was only tested at 18mm and 200mm. Yes, only the two most extreme focal lengths. It's like it was the first zoom he'd ever tested. Likewise, he reached a completely different conclusion (some would say misguided, given how he collected his data) about the lens than other, more thorough, reviewers. What a joke.

It looks like he at least threw in a few random mid-wide focal length tests for the Tamron review, but I wouldn't put too much stock in his conclusions. He is a very unscientific reviewer.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top