Canon 28/1.8 and 16-35 v. Sigma 28/1.8 EX DG

Started Dec 28, 2002 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Jeffrey Behr
Jeffrey Behr Veteran Member • Posts: 3,869
Canon 28/1.8 and 16-35 v. Sigma 28/1.8 EX DG

After receiving my 1Ds on 29 November, I briefly tested the 2 wide-angle lenses I owned, the Canon 28mm/1.8 and the 16-35/2.8, for chromatic aberation (CA). I was disappointed in the CA performance of the 28/1.8 and started looking for a replacement. I found that while there are not very many 28mm/1.8 Canon-AF lenses around, Sigma has 2. The earlier and less expensive is the ‘28mm f1.8 II Aspherical’. I found mine thru eBay for $130 delivered, from Sharper Photo. In testing, I found it never better than my Canon so I returned it. The Sigma ‘28mm f1.8 EX Aspherical DG Macro’ is the later version and is quite a handful compared with its earlier brother or the Canon. It uses 77mm filters, fortunately a common Canon size. Yet it’s quite affordable at only $204 from Delta. BTW, I use a prime 28 for panoramas, something that’s difficult to do with the 16-35, as its nodal point is about 3 inches (8 cm) forward of its mount.

I shot some ‘landscapes’ out my west-facing garage, into the bright Phoenix sky (but not into the sun). I included in the tests my 16-35 which is turning into a great lens on the 1Ds. I shot large fine JPGs (because I didn’t feel like investing the time to convert these) and used MLU, selftimer, Velbon Carmagne 630 CF tripod, Kirk BH3, and a cable release.

I carefully compared center sharpness at f4, f8, and f16, and corner sharpness and CA at f8 and f16. Results were interesting. The 16-35 won overall, something that surprised me since it’s a zoom. I guess those Canon lens designers are earning their pay lately! Of the 7 things scored, the Canon 28 was best in only one, corner sharpness at f8 (where it was worst in CA), while the 16-35 took 4 bests and the Sigma 3*.

Again, overall, the Canon 16-35 won, with a average score of 2.57 (of a possible 3), which probably is one reason it costs around $1400. Second was the Sigma with an average score of 2.29, while the Canon 28 was a distant third at 1.29. It was clearly the worst at CA, but the differences in sharpness among the three were much tougher to see.

I’ll be keeping the Sigma 28. It’s worthy of mounting on the 1Ds.

–That totals 8, not 7, because 2 tied for best in one criterion.
--
http://community.webshots.com/user/jeffreybehr

 Jeffrey Behr's gear list:Jeffrey Behr's gear list
Fujifilm X-H2 Fujifilm 16-55mm F2.8R LM WR Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR +4 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow