Canon G1 X sensor review

Started Jan 31, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Great Bustard Forum Pro • Posts: 33,748
Re: Sensor size does not affect DR

Shorthand wrote:

Bustard - Quantum Efficency along with read noise is what goes in to high ISO performance, not dynamic range.

Dynamic range can be completely independent of QE - lower QE is more-or-less just like having a smaller aperture lens.

Quite right. I suppose what I should have said is that the G12 pixels (2 micron) have 2.11x (1.08 stops) the saturation limit per area as the D3s pixels, and only 70% the read noise / area (0.52 stops less) making for a 1.6 stop DR advantage at base ISO (based on an equal area comparison of a FF sensor composed of G12 pixels vs the D3s sensor).

However, as Steen noted, the S100 pixels (1.8 micron) extend that lead in further still in favor of smaller pixels.

Bob - While you're making good, cogent arguments, someone on the Internet will always be wrong ... and want the last word.

Ask Bob about 155.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Jim
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow