Nikon Spanked By m4/3 in DPR Review?

Started Jan 21, 2012 | Discussions thread
sigala1 Veteran Member • Posts: 3,844
Nikon 1 does have better ISO 3200

Kwick1 wrote:

It's unbelievable to me that DPR said that the Nikons had better high ISO performance than m43. Did they even look at their own comparison tool? It's not even close. The Nikons turn to mush while even the E-PL1 are great.

My own eyes from looking at RAW and JPEG tell me that Nikon 1 has slightly better ISO 3200 than the Olympus E-PM1 or E-P3. This is just an indictment of the pathetic and old sensor in the Olympus cameras. I hope they have something a lot better in the OM-D series.

Of course, the Olympus camera is a WAY better low light camera when you put on the 25mm f/1.4 lens.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow