Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla working on that, can't tell you more
Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - not working on that, can't tell you more
Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q can make good photos -bla-bla-bla
Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q doesn't need a bigger sensor, the sensor is big enough [it has enough pixels?] for 17x19 prints [what is this size anyway?]
Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q and 645.
Q: ?
A: 645
Q: ?
A: F..k the APS-C, we plan to develop it for 645, no release date, still beta
Q: ?
A: No we are not going to support that, even though everyone else either support or is planning to support this. Check the Youtube, some freaks are smart enough to live without this feature anyway
Q: Future?
A: Optimistic - Water-proof DSLRs.
That was the usual sales rep. talk. "Our products are good the way they are, we don't care about the people who wants more manual control in video or tethered software, because we believe they're a minority."
But in the meanwhile, some Pentax shooters tired to wait for long tele lenses, tethered solutions, decent video capabilities, a FF DSLR or a large sensor mirrorless ILC are jumping the fence. Not that it matters much, since new buyers replace the ones that are gone. But that can't help much grabbing more market shares. Still, profit matters more than market shares, so as long as the company is profitable, there's no reason to grab added market shares. Except maybe looking like a leading brand instead of an underdog brand.
Anyway, if Pentax users complains about a feature found on a competitor's product, the executives at Pentax will give them their sales rep. talk, saying that "if a competitor's product is doing something a Pentax product can't do, it's not because the Pentax product lacks something: it's simply because that competitors' products are actually doing something not so useful, that only a small minority of people want."
Maybe that's why more than 75% of advertisements, TV series, short films, full length feature films and videoclips shot on DSLRs are shot on Canon EOS DSLRs (most of the rest being shot on Nikon DSLRs). Because there are only a minority of people shooting stuff that goes beyond YouTube and the like.
Yep, lack manual control in video is not a big deal. Tethered solutions are not a priority. Neither is FF. But the Pentax Q is great, just like all our existing product.
Sigh.
That said, this is not a Pentax-only problem. All camera and electronics companies executives gave similar, sales rep. talk in the past, and they are still giving such sales rep. talk today.
"We believe the D700 doesn't need a video upgrade or more megapixels, since only a minority of buyers are looking into video or more resolution as a major selling point. And the D7000 has both video and higher resolution, so users who feel the D700 doesn't meet their criteria can bla-bla-bla."
Or "The AF system of the 5D MkII is great for what the camera was designed for, which is landscape, portrait and studio photography in good light. The fact that the 7D, a camera worth $1000 less than the 5D MkII, has a better AF system, is actually because of a differenciation between the intended usage of the 7D vs. the 5DII. We believe the 5D MkII's AF system is very capable in most bla-bla-bla."
--
If photography can be considered like painting, then I'm still at the preschool "paint with your fingers" level.