Pentax Interview at CES

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla working on that, can't tell you more

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - not working on that, can't tell you more

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q can make good photos -bla-bla-bla

Q: ?

A: Bla-bla-bla - Q doesn't need a bigger sensor, the sensor is big enough [it has enough pixels?] for 17x19 prints [what is this size anyway?]

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q and 645.

Q: ?
A: 645

Q: ?
A: F..k the APS-C, we plan to develop it for 645, no release date, still beta

Q: ?

A: No we are not going to support that, even though everyone else either support or is planning to support this. Check the Youtube, some freaks are smart enough to live without this feature anyway

Q: Future?
A: Optimistic - Water-proof DSLRs.

--
Cheers,
Alex
See?? Good news about weather resistance!
 
That was pretty pathetic. This sums it up:

"I think there's a couple of things I've seen with our competitors that are very compelling, like auto-focus during video, and more manual controls of exposure during the video. However, I think what's important is to realize that while that stuff is... would be nice to have, it's not absolutely necessary. "

Not what you want to hear from your camera company.
Couldn't care less. I don't even want video on my camera.
--
Dan
There's always this guy for Pentax to market too. ^
 
biggest advantage is control of dog, but with medium format u have more control much much better iq. a camera with 20 or 30 million pixel costing 4 k would be a nice add to the line up. a new full frame mean a new lens line up, how many years we had to wait to have 5 6 top grade lenses at this moment?

k5 and DA* are perfect for pentax market. ricoh simply should keep on this path and maybe add some ricoh product, like a k module.
if i need full frame i can buy nikon or canon.
i completely agree. full frame is at this point totally useless.

the market is not going that direction and at the moment Iq on apse is great really comparable to full frame.
Not "totally useless", there really are advatages in FF but they are not necessary for most shooters, including the vast majority craving or already shooting FF.
Anyways, this wil surely cause a lot of "Pentax is doomed"reactions.

--




The difference between genius and LBA is that genius has its
limits.
  • Janneman ( adaptation of the Kings quote from Albert Einstein)
 
i hope to be wrong and maybe ricoh will surprise me, but i really cannot understand all the critics towards hoya, and happiness for the ricoh acquisition.
all in all hoya produced did things right.
There's a new interview posted at Imaging Resource with John Carlson, Pentax:
 
Oddly enough, he spoke of confidence in the MF and APS-C markets. That creates an implication, however imprecise, that they are not confident about the FF market.
Pentax is in the MF market because, even though it is a niche catergoy they have legacy experience in that area and there was little to no competition at the price point where they could offer products.

Pentax is NOT in the FF market because it too is a niche category, but one in which there is already very strong competition.

Pentax is in the APS-C market because it's much more of a mainstream product with plenty of volume where they can be profitable even with only a small percentage of the total sales.

In other words: Pentax competes in those markets where they think they can make money. Not competing in the FF market doesn't mean that FF is dead or has limitations, it just means that it's an upscale market with a lot fewer sales and very strong competition - not a very inviting place to hang out your shingle.
 
Wow, that was an exiting interview.....................and Pentax even had the gaul to place it on their facebook page !!!! Lol.......laughable really, poor guy was hamstrung

Guess I will have to stand by previous comments on other threads, that they have a lot to do and deal with............damned if you do have a table at every show or damned if you don't.
 
biggest advantage is control of dog...
Don't need a full frame camera for that. Just use a leash and muzzle.

--
Cheers,
sfa

A very limited photographer ...

 
their strategy on their line ups asap. Seems like there are some exciting projects on the table but moving forward depends on this.

--

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- "You are taking life too seriously if it bugs you in some way that a guy quotes himself in the .sig quote" - Ricardo
 
Fairly predictable.

Those hoping for a FF DSLR would be advised to give up that idea. Which is a shame because it's far more relevant than MF digital is to the market segment.

I appreciate it's not a quick thing to do you need the lenses to back that up.

On the Q he seemed a bit shy to probably admit it's not been a hit but then it was an instant fail from day one before it hit the shops.
The camera you call an instant fail was voted #1 for 2011 over any other camera at dc impress japan. While that's just internet voting and may not reflect average Joe, I don't think it can be simply dismissed as instant fail.

Also in Japan it has indeed moved some units though I wonder overall how profitable. But some people look at it for fun, others - the street photographer can see a benefit. Others say "small sensor so it s*cks" as a knee jerk reaction.
Couldn't help but laugh on the K-r comments it's very capable well John boy go out and shoot with one and you'll have some very eye opening situations esp in some lighting conditions ;-)

If you want FF 35mm I'd just make a move to the top 2 players at this stage.
--

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- "You are taking life too seriously if it bugs you in some way that a guy quotes himself in the .sig quote" - Ricardo
 
Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla working on that, can't tell you more

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - not working on that, can't tell you more

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q can make good photos -bla-bla-bla

Q: ?

A: Bla-bla-bla - Q doesn't need a bigger sensor, the sensor is big enough [it has enough pixels?] for 17x19 prints [what is this size anyway?]

Q: ?
A: Bla-bla-bla - Q and 645.

Q: ?
A: 645

Q: ?
A: F..k the APS-C, we plan to develop it for 645, no release date, still beta

Q: ?

A: No we are not going to support that, even though everyone else either support or is planning to support this. Check the Youtube, some freaks are smart enough to live without this feature anyway

Q: Future?
A: Optimistic - Water-proof DSLRs.
That was the usual sales rep. talk. "Our products are good the way they are, we don't care about the people who wants more manual control in video or tethered software, because we believe they're a minority."

But in the meanwhile, some Pentax shooters tired to wait for long tele lenses, tethered solutions, decent video capabilities, a FF DSLR or a large sensor mirrorless ILC are jumping the fence. Not that it matters much, since new buyers replace the ones that are gone. But that can't help much grabbing more market shares. Still, profit matters more than market shares, so as long as the company is profitable, there's no reason to grab added market shares. Except maybe looking like a leading brand instead of an underdog brand.

Anyway, if Pentax users complains about a feature found on a competitor's product, the executives at Pentax will give them their sales rep. talk, saying that "if a competitor's product is doing something a Pentax product can't do, it's not because the Pentax product lacks something: it's simply because that competitors' products are actually doing something not so useful, that only a small minority of people want."

Maybe that's why more than 75% of advertisements, TV series, short films, full length feature films and videoclips shot on DSLRs are shot on Canon EOS DSLRs (most of the rest being shot on Nikon DSLRs). Because there are only a minority of people shooting stuff that goes beyond YouTube and the like.

Yep, lack manual control in video is not a big deal. Tethered solutions are not a priority. Neither is FF. But the Pentax Q is great, just like all our existing product.

Sigh.

That said, this is not a Pentax-only problem. All camera and electronics companies executives gave similar, sales rep. talk in the past, and they are still giving such sales rep. talk today.

"We believe the D700 doesn't need a video upgrade or more megapixels, since only a minority of buyers are looking into video or more resolution as a major selling point. And the D7000 has both video and higher resolution, so users who feel the D700 doesn't meet their criteria can bla-bla-bla."

Or "The AF system of the 5D MkII is great for what the camera was designed for, which is landscape, portrait and studio photography in good light. The fact that the 7D, a camera worth $1000 less than the 5D MkII, has a better AF system, is actually because of a differenciation between the intended usage of the 7D vs. the 5DII. We believe the 5D MkII's AF system is very capable in most bla-bla-bla."

--

If photography can be considered like painting, then I'm still at the preschool "paint with your fingers" level.
 
I hope the supertele is not a 300mm f2.8. That's a $5000 lens, and won't be a big seller due to ever-improving sensors and the DA*300 f4 available at a fraction of the price. Fast apertures are not as important now as in the film days when ASA 800 was really fast. A DA*400 f4 or 4.5, that's what we need.
--
Dan
Fully agree with the DA* 400 f4 sentiment.

--
http://geoffcole.smugmug.com/
 
Even small enough and good wide open 400/5.6 wouldn't hurt.
 
the K-5 is the smallest weather sealed DSLR with great photographer centric controls, best DR of all measured cameras so far (though that should finally change soon), and best in class high ISO performance, but things like that, somehow, don't seem to matter as to whether Pentax did a good job or not.

--

Raist3d/Ricardo (Photographer, software dev.)- "You are taking life too seriously if it bugs you in some way that a guy quotes himself in the .sig quote" - Ricardo
 
biggest advantage is control of dog...
Don't need a full frame camera for that. Just use a leash and muzzle.
buscuits help too....
OTOH the neighbours cat will spoil everything you have achieved.
but that is a one time only issue, no cat left afterwards...

--




The difference between genius and LBA is that genius has its
limits.
  • Janneman ( adaptation of the Kings quote from Albert Einstein)
 
I hope the supertele is not a 300mm f2.8. That's a $5000 lens, and won't be a big seller due to ever-improving sensors and the DA*300 f4 available at a fraction of the price. Fast apertures are not as important now as in the film days when ASA 800 was really fast. A DA*400 f4 or 4.5, that's what we need.
--
Dan
Fully agree with the DA* 400 f4 sentiment.

--
http://geoffcole.smugmug.com/
--

I am hankering after a FL in that range...plus a TC...perhaps the delay in its appearnace might have something to do with PRIC trying to get AF working - I was expecing a leap in AF from K20D to K-5, it's still very ponderous.

20 years ago a maginifent Mickey Thomas free-kick and Steve Watkin's sublime winner knocked the Gunners out of the FA Cup - 1st vs 92nd... Let's hope Andy Morrell's Red Army continue WREXHAM's unsurpassed Giant-Killing tradition tomorrow.....
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top