does a high resolution sensor mean bad low-light capabilities?

Started Jan 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
Midnighter Senior Member • Posts: 1,727
Re: does a high resolution sensor mean bad low-light capabilities?

Its been debated afresh in the Sony forum for APS-C 16MP Vs 24MP. In my opinion there is a threshold (with comparable sensor technologies) when extra resolution + image downscaling is overpowered by pixel level light starvation that a lower resolution sensor can still cope with. Since noise climbs out of less exposed areas first the more an image relies on dark/shadow for its visual quality/impact the more important clean ISO performance is compared to extra resolution detail in the image. For the Sony argument I would say there is a 2 stop range where resolution VS high ISO performance dukes it out, 24MP being superior to 400ISO, 16MP being superior at 3200+. Lots of arguments for and against that view, but the opinion I originally came up seemed to be echoed by the tests at luminous landscape:

That said they came to the conclusion it was splitting hairs unless you pushed it to crazy ISO values beyond ISO3200 (which might not be so crazy for some).

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow